Skip to Main Content
by Vault Law Editors | October 03, 2008


Since at least last March—when Citigroup and the late Wachovia were sued by a hedge fund over derivatives contracts—BigLaw has been  anticipating the next wave of subprime related litigation in the form of credit default swap lawsuits.  (Recall Professor Greenberger’s helpful definition of a credit swap: “ Really insurance but not regulated like insurance; really a futures contracts but not regulated like a futures contract.”)

Yesterday, as reported in  The, the chairs of Paul Hastings’ derivatives and newly-formed  credit crisis groups predicted that “the banking industry's implosion means that banks with a piece of the $43 trillion market in these unregulated instruments are likely to sue to recoup their losses. And who are they going to sue? Other banks.”  (By the way, note the $23 trillion difference with the $66 trillion figure cited  here.  But hey what’s the big deal: it’s only a discrepancy equivalent to seven times the annual GDP of China.)

Due to those pesky client conflicts, this impending spate of bank-on-bank litigation will not necessarily translate into a windfall of work for Wall Street litigators. As we noted here back in June, One firm gathers what another firm .  And just as Quinn Emmanuel stepped up in London when the  Magic Circle, one has to think that the firm will be similarly opportunistic here, despite a  rough start with this sort of lawsuit.

                                                  -posted by brian




Filed Under: Law

Want to be found by top employers? Upload Your Resume

Join Gold to Unlock Company Reviews

Subscribe to the Vault

Be the first to read new articles and get updates from the Vault team.