Vault.com: the insider career network

Job Survey: Engineer I

This Engineer I career survey is just one of 1000s of exclusive career surveys available on Vault. Find out what it's actually like on the job with Vault's job surveys.

Read all Vault Career Surveys for the inside scoop on specific jobs
Read Vault Employee Surveys for the inside scoop on specific employers
Read Vault Student/Alumni Surveys for the inside scoop on colleges and grad schools



Location: Phoenix, AZ
Company: Honeywell
Experience: Entry-level
Highest Level of Education: Undergraduate Degree



Job Responsibilities
Support senior engineers in design of turbine engines and their parts, with increasing responsibility and technical difficulty as skills increased. I was part of a required 2-year new grad rotation program, spending 6-8 months in four departments (starting in hiring department)for the first two years with the company. I was hired by the reliability department, which uses statistical and other analysis methods to analyze the failure rates of parts and determine the safety and reliability of the system, or enigne. My specific duties included working with Project Engineering and reliability data personelle to obtain the necessary data, track failure rates and other reliability metrics, forecast future events and failures based on previous failures using statistical modeling programs, especially Weibull distributions, attending root cause meetings to present analysis results, compiling FMEA and fault tree documents based on failure rates, modes, and effects gathered from the appropriate engineering group, and detailed tracking of all failures during certification and prototype testing using a FRACAS database and review board to prevents "escapes". Next, I rotated to a group that designed control systems for military & helicopter engines. I was assignedto work with an engineer that was designing a new torqumeter for a two-engine helicopter. The torquemeter needed to be as accurate as possible so that the two eniges could match the torque they provided to the helicopter rotor. During the 7 months I was there, I processed all the test data from research testing being done to choose between two designs. I worked with the design engineer to develop the data processing procedure to imitate the electronic controller/processor being developed by a supplier. I also worked with a Six Sigma Black Belt candidate and the sensor supplier to interpret the results of my data processing and analysis. I convinced the team to accept results from Minitab instead of Excel, kept track of test data logs and files I recieved from the lab, and ultimately worked with a Matlab programming expert to automate the data processing and mimick signal filtering and signal processing that would be present in the final processor hardware. The result of our work affected the design and specifications of the supplier's processor/controller for the torquemeter. I had regular contact with the design engineer 3-4 times a week at first, then 1-2 times a week near the end of the 7 months I worked with him. After that, I rotated into the Project Engineering group. I met with the Program Manager and other project engineers every morning to review the status of an engine development program. My responsibilities were to track the Reliability & Maintainability progress. I worked with the lead Project engineer, and with the Reliability engineer and the Maintainanbility engineer to develop the schedule of deliverables and FAA certification documents and track their progress against their schedule and the master schedule with top-level milestones. Outside of the daily morning 1/2-hour meetings, there was practically no contact with the other project engnieers or the department's manager. They spent most of their time fighting fires and fixing problems, and didn't work well together, dispite the morning meetings. They also didn't give me very much work to do, and the work they did give me to do, they just dumped in my lap and expected me to just figure things out on my own. It was hard to get in contact with anyone, and when I asked questions, I got "when you figure it out, tell me, I'm still trying to figure it out, myself." Not very encouraging. I killed a lot of time during that six months. My last rotation was in a department that designed gears, bearings, rotating seals, and lube systems for APUs (Auxiliary Power Units). I researched gear and lube systems drawings and compiled parameters to help in senior engineers' analysis. I also processed bearing rig test data, analyzed lube & seal system pressures by modifying an Excel spreadsheet developed by a senior engineer for a previous analysis.
Job Requirements
Honeywell's Aerospace Propulsion engines/APUs departments hire mainly mechanical and aerospace engineering graduates. Bachelor's of Science degrees are a minimum, with Masters and PhD degrees also hired. Those with graduate degrees are not required to go through the two-year New Grad rotation program. Undergraduate engineering classes are notoriously hard, but the difficulty is mostly due to the immense knowledge required for engineering work. In my engineering studies, my professor were generally helpful and generous, and the grading liberal, but even for a medium quality class, expect to invest more effort and study time to truly understand the concepts.
Uppers
When in a good department, there is a environment of collaboration and sharing information. The experienced engineers have no problem asking for new grads to teach them things that they don't know, like new software developments. Each engineer has different knowledge, and often share programs and spreadsheets from previous analysis and projects. The benifits are exceptional and comprehensive.
Downers
Highly variable experience depending on your supervisors and coworkers, as well as current project you are working on. Project engineers are not well trained, and although there is a pretense of documenting procedures and passing on knowledge, there is still a wide difference between the capabilities and expertise, depending mainly on department.
Lifestyle
Standard 8-4 M-F workdays, with slight variation in shifts possible. Oddice environment, but due to the Arizona location cultural influence, slightly more casual environment, mostly polo shirts and slacks, referring to upper management, as well as coworkers, on first-name basis. Diversity levels high, but minorities and women tend to be clustered in certain departments, especially analytical specialties. Company social events include an annual rodeo, complete with royalty, but most departments socialize indepently with events organized by their manager or his manager, depending on individual taste. Sometimes, large projects might host social events after a major milestone, depending on management personalities. Primary reporting responsibility is to your manager in a department of engineers performing the same function on a variety of projects. You also have reporting obligations to the Project engineers leading your project, as assigned by your department manager. this is known as a matrix structure.
Compensation
Starting salary as a new grad was $50,000, with 5-6% raises yearly due to a preformanced-based review process. However, engineer performance can be hard to measure, and results are often more dependent on team effort and management decisions that the individual engineer's competance. Bonus systems exist, but often change, and again are based on the subjective recommendations of managers, or sometimes even the subjective judgements of your coworkers for smaller >$200 bonuses, depending on the current bonus plan.
Advice to Jobseekers
Watch the aerospace industry very carefully, espcially due to the recent airline bankrupcies. The companies in that are in that supply chain are feeling the hit, including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Pratt & Whitney, and Honeywell, as well as their suppliers. There have also been changes in Defense spending, shifting from mechanical defense systems like fighter jets and helicopters to electronic and computerized systems, communications technology, automated missile systems, and unmanned air vehicles. Those companies that specialize in more traditional defense systems are struggling to compete by incorporating more electronic systems and sending more jobs overseas. The latest push is to outsource not only manufacturing and programming jobs, but engineering analysis, as well. There has also been a move to give mnore design authority to suppliers, outsourcing entire parts and services that had previously been tightly controlled by the bigger aerospace companies. This is good news for smaller US companies, but will mean many more layoffs in the future to force front line managers to carry out the globalization and outsourcing policies. This unstable market is also encouraging hiring temporary, or contract, engineers through contracting companies, for periods ranging from 3 months to 2 years at a time, as business demands rise and fall.

This Engineer I career survey is just one of 1000s of exclusive career surveys available on Vault. Find out what it's actually like on the job with Vault's job surveys.

Read all Vault Career Surveys for the inside scoop on specific jobs
Read Vault Employee Surveys for the inside scoop on specific employers
Read Vault Student/Alumni Surveys for the inside scoop on colleges and grad schools