| Topic Name: |
IF YOU HAD TO HIRE A FIRST TIME NEWS DIRECTOR |
| Message Name: |
I've been both.... |
| Date Posted: |
06/11/2005 |
| In Reply To: |
Here we have a great example of how non-reporters attempt to define reporters. :-) |
| Message: |
And I agree with aznews.
What makes a good reporter good is that they are able to focus on one thing and screen out all the background bullshit. This is crucial when on a deadline...reporters need to be able to get the package written, get the live shot on the air and not worry about what the heck else is going on around them. I don't like reporters who are easily distracted.
Producers need to be aware of everything going on around them...because if they aren't, something is going to bite them in the butt during the show (that tease you forgot to check, the weather video you didn't tell the meteorolgist about, the consumer reporter who's about to say something that's going to get the station sued etc, etc).
I've known a lot great news directors who were producers, photographers (who also need to worry about multiple issues at the same time) and assignment editors. I've also known some good news directors who were reporters, but had other experience as well. I can't think of any news directors who have ONLY been reporters.
All that being said...here's what you need to be able to deal with in today's news room as a news director. Lawsuits.
Every single person who doesn't get their contract renewed now runs to HR and files some sort of suit. A few have merit. Most don't. But today's news directors now spend a ridiculous amount of time dealing with HR issues. It's bad for the newsroom and it makes a lot of very good ND's want to get out of the business.
|
|
