| Topic Name: |
McKinsey in decline? |
| Message Name: |
It's the retard again |
| Date Posted: |
02/22/2006 |
| In Reply To: |
you are a stupid retard.
Personal experiences of vault posters = relevant DATA but small sample size
Significant majority of the c-level execs and line managers at major tech/IT companies have PhDs in engineering you retard. |
| Message: |
I had briefly considered going into MC after undergrad but am happy I didn't if "analyst-wannabe" is at all indicative of the level of maturity and intelligence at the major firms. And to think that CEOs pay for such people's advice! What does your deck have: a 2x2 matrix with "least retarded to most retarded" on one of the axes?
I understand the pay may be better in MC compared to academia, but don't even try to compare it to that of top law firms (which just increased base salaries to $135k (plus $15-$25 bonus depending on billables) vs., what, $115-$120 in MC?). And even in academia, don't forget you're only working like 10 hrs/week and get time off, etc compared to 80+ hours and travel in MC. Yes - I'm including office hours.
I realize that many execs of tech companies are PhDs. Thanks for the info. What does that have to do w/ the conversation? I hope you're not comparing working in MC and cranking our ppt decks and excel models with working at Cisco as an engineer or at Microsoft as a developer or as anything at a startup.
Finally, I won't/can't respond to "bonus1's" comment. I have no idea what he's trying to imply. That Stanford is better than Yale Law? OK - you win.
Sorry to disappoint, but I won't be visiting this board anymore. I only hoped to give my perspective on the whole non-MBA in MC issue, but it's apparenty not welcome. So much for open minds and stimulating debate. I guess that's a lawyer thing.
|
|
