| Topic Name: |
When side-jobs hurt your chances.. |
| Message Name: |
... |
| Date Posted: |
09/02/2004 |
| In Reply To: |
You call yourself a banker? What a bunch of neocon bulltrash. I see what this is about, you've got a hard on for him. I heard Thinkandask on the radio this week -- he's got far more balls than you ever will. This country needs more guys like him. He doesn't yell, he just wants everyone to question what is going on in this country and he is encouraging discourse, but firm action to keep our jobs in the USA. Isn't that a crazy idea? Duh!
If you read his website from your childlike diatribe I can tell you did NOT, you'd see he presents both sides and takes stands on issues important to him. How many of us can really say we do? (YOU GOT IT - SILENCE.)
You call him a liar but he does far better stories than most media does today. See his homepage? 3 pro-Shrub stories! I see nothing on Kerry! He attacks pedophiles and the Saudi terrorists. He attacks gays in drag for not beig real men and religious zealots for ruining politics, and he also has a level of compassion not seen online in my experience.
He is there for those who really need support especially the unemployed. His prison letters very touching and the male rape survivor stories left me speechless and fearful this may have happend to one of my sons too. I always thought there was more to flight 93 and Afghanistan and Iraq and I see your banking notes covered switching Iraq back to dollars. I knew it I knew all along this was about money in Iraq. Did you read his bio page? Yup, back to my first statment. He's got more balls than any man I've met in the workplace. Thinkandask doesn't need a new job, he needs to run for political office!!! Wipe all you necons out for good.
He threatens your beliefs but you need to keep people stupid in order to keep your portfolio of fantasy.
Chris |
| Message: |
By "question" do you mean making things up?
As I said in my first post I read one article and when I saw that the entire thing was incorrect I stopped reading. Perhaps other articles on his website are truthful but from his unwillingness to correct false information in the first article I read I wouldn't trust him to inform me about subjects (pro or against Bush) I know less about then this one (how would I know he wasn't doing the same in those?).
It's great that he's "there" for the unemployed. This does not change the fact that his article is wrong and even with his "journalistic integrity" he refuses to change it. I have posted links to where I'm getting my information, why does he refuse to do the same? Don't be blinded by your politics he could be ??there?? for the unemployed by using correct information just as easily. No matter how much you like him the information in this article is wrong.
Finally, how do you know what my politics are? Can you quote me where I said I supported one party or ideology? I believe I mentioned Bush once when I posted a link about how France actually collects their unemployment data (which is different from what he said in his ??article??) and asked if it was a conspiracy to keep Bush in power??
|
|
