| Topic Name: |
This might be an old website |
| Message Name: |
No, you're right |
| Date Posted: |
03/02/2006 |
| In Reply To: |
Oh gee... if we get a whole bunch of anonymous people to bash Hewitt with -45's, we can be #1. Wow, that's so scientfic. Funny, the high ratings correlate to very few postings and the low ratings correlate to lots of postings. The numbers accumulate, not average out. |
| Message: |
It isn't scientific. Scientific is the engagement score of 34 when it used to be in the 80's just a few years ago and the average is in the 50's. Any way you slice it, though, people are NOT happy at Hewitt.
but...I did ask people to be honest when they put Hewitt on the top 10 in my previous post. ;-)
|
|
